Tuesday 24 March 2015

SC's Section 66A ruling

SC's Section 66A ruling: BJP pays price for a self-serving U-turn

Narendra Modi is indisputably India's Number One Social Media politician. No other politician has been able to harness the power of social media as astutely as he did in his run-up to power.

Therefore it is especially embarrassing for his government to now be on the losing side of what is being hashtagged a landmark #SocialMediaVerdict.

The BJP could have been on the winning side of the Battle over Section 66A. Nothing would have signaled a dramatic break from the UPA-past as much as the new government telling the Supreme Court it recognized that Section 66A of the Information and Technology Act was unconstitutional, untenable and violated the right of citizens to freedom of expression.

Instead it now has to suffer the ignominy of being told all those things by the Indian Supreme Court.

The NDA government is trying to make its mark in many different areas of Indian public life. The PM wants to overhaul many aspects of the way India works and the way India sees itself. But the intricacies of land reform and pension bills, while enormously important, are beyond the grasp of the vast majority of Indian citizens.
]Narendra Modi. AFP.Narendra Modi. AFP.
But ordinary Indians understand and can empathize with the utter unfairness of a random citizen being hauled off to the police thana for just forwarding a cartoon or “liking” a status on Facebook. An ordinary person not only understands that but he also can easily see himself in that hapless offender's shoes. You or I might not exactly grasp how the Land Reform bill will affect our daily lives but we understand only too well how Section 66A could royally screw it up.

We have seen 66A in action. We know the names of the people whose lives have spiraled out of control thanks to it.

Shaheen Dada, Rinu Srinivasan, Ambikesh Mahapatra, Aseem Trivedi, Ravi Srinivasan, Kanwal Bharti. None of them were household names until they became unwitting Section 66A victims.

On the other side, almost invariably, there is a powerful politician whose ego was trampled on by the temerity of an ordinary citizen to speak her mind.

If there was every a gross example of a law that existed as the tool of the political bully it was Section 66A.

The BJP's great humiliation today is that it is paying the price for ignoring what it once knew all too well.

The IT cell of the BJP once compared Section 66A to the government's draconian measures during the Emergency. As opposition leader Arun Jaitley made a speech in the Rajya Sabhatearing into Section 66A after the government was revealed to have blocked almost 300 websites. “It would not even be desirable to (control technology)”, Jaitley had said at that time. “If the Internet had been in existence the internal emergency of 1975 would have been a big fiasco.” Jaitley at that time had admitted that there was a danger that the Internet could become the hothouse of hate speech frenzy but argued that terms used in Section 66A like harmful, harassing, defamatory, blasphemous were “absolutely subjective.” “Now there's information which my friends in the government might consider is very harmful to them but I might think it's my right to express that information,” said Jaitley.

“But this was ‘once upon a time'” writes Javed Anwer in the Daily O. “Now the BJP is in power and just like the government before it, even though the two governments supposedly differ on ideology like cheese and chalk, is finding Section 66A useful.”

That's why the government's additional solicitor general Tushar Mehta did his best to defend the indefensible making comforting noises about “freedom of expression” but clearly unwilling to let go of the advantages of having Section66A in its kitty. And let's make no mistake, the vague wording of Section 66A is precisely what made it so useful to governments who wanted to crack down on dissent. Which right-thinking government would be willing to let go of that unbridled power to define to its own advantage what was offensive, defamatory or harmful?

So in effect the government ended up doing the same dance that Kapil Sibal had once done. Sibal had refused to change the wording of the act and instead suggested fresh guidelines would be issued to make it more difficult for police to arrest people for posts on social networking sites. Obviously that worked splendidly for the teenager recently arrested by the UP police at the behest of Azam Khan's office for sharing something defamatory about him on Facebook. And now we have the current minister Ravi Shankar Prasad telling Times Now that his government had a clearly different stance on Section 66A than the previous one. “We were willing to come with further stringent rules, guidelines, regulations to prevent any further misuse,” he said. Sorry, but that just sounds like Sibal-ese under another label.

The face is the Supreme Court just dealt the NDA a box of lemons and Ravi Shankar Prasad has the unhappy task of making lemonade out of it. The BJP stands revealed as yet another party that is happy to take up the cudgels for freedom of expression while in the opposition but then hem and haw about it as soon as it is in power.

It need not have been so.

It was not that long ago when Narendra Modi had changed his display picture on Twitter to a black box in support of many ordinary journalists who found their accounts blocked by the UPA government. Namita Bhandare wrote on NewsLaundry then that "if the battle for minds in the virtual world has begun, let it be said, Round One to Modi and the BJP." As #GOIBlocks trended, the social media-savvy Modi tweeted “As a common man, I join the protest against the crackdown on freedom of speech.”

Now he is the Prime Minister and no longer the common man. And the Supreme Court has basically expressed no confidence in any political party's ability to truly prevent misuse of Section 66A. It's taken the government's toy away.

This could have been the BJP, arguably India's most Internet-savvy party's golden opportunity to have shown itself as a modern party that was truly different from the others when it came to freedom of expression and the Internet.

The Section 66A verdict was whopping victory for freedom of expression but a giant lost opportunity for the BJP. Once it had protested the "crackdown on freedom of speech". Now it finds itself shut out of the celebration.
http://www.firstpost.com/politics/scs-section-66a-ruling-bjp-pays-price-for-a-self-serving-u-turn-2170289.html

Saturday 21 March 2015

In Memory of DK Ravi

In Memory of My Senior, DK Ravi

(22-year-old Neetha Raj M is a final year BSC Agri student from GKVK, Bangalore. DK Ravi was an alumni of the same university.)
"Hey, come on why are you studying so much, you bookworm? Enjoy life, have fun" -  these were the words thrown at my friend Pradayini when day and night made no difference to her for her IAS preparation. A voice in her heart always said "I want to become a dynamic IAS officer and shatter the walls of corruption and change this bloody system". But now this energetic soul has lost everything. She is depressed and has not eaten or slept for the last few days. This is not the story of just one girl; injustice to Ravi anna has shattered dreams of many such souls all over India.

She says "This is India, no one can change it, this is the fate of honest officers in the land of Rama. They get slapped by uneducated, political leaders. Not just Ravi anna, but many officers in the country face the same fate". But still thousands of people have joined the protest to get justice for an IAS officer who was brave and honest. This proves his popularity and art of living.
Untouchability is a curse for so many in our country...Ravi anna was not just a civil servant, but a social reformer. He took leaps and bounds to cast off the caste system for which he reached the houses of the scheduled caste and tribes. He ate with them, spent time with them. People could not even dream of such a down-to-earth officer. With his loving interaction he not just entered their huts, but also their hearts.
The feet of the poor were worn out by going around to government offices but Ravi anna brought the government offices itself to the doorstep of poor men. For the poor, desperate souls of Kolar, Ravi annaturned out to be a surprise gift.
"I have a brand called non-corrupt officer which I never want to give up and live it till my last breath". These were the words uttered by him when, at lunch together recently, his friends Rohit and Madhu teased him
"When will you start making money like others?"
Becoming an IAS officer is the dream of a number of poor and middle class students but this dream stays just a dream because IAS coaching is not something everyone can get. But Ravi anna made it possible, keeping aside all his weekend fun and joining them, giving UPSC coaching classes. None of us felt that he was a Deputy Commissioner but he remained sweet Ravi anna always. He would eat with people, laugh with people, and dance with people without any barrier of his status.
His major challenge was to curb corruption and control the sand mafia. He fought to get back  government-encroached land and water tanks. He completed the works which had been pending for the past thirty years within just one year.
He was a son of Kunigal, he became the son of Kolar just in a year because of his love for the people. These people wanted him to be cremated in the womb of Kolar. On the other hand, the people of Kunigal wanted it to be done in his birth place. So, he was laid on the land of Kunigal and he was covered with the soil brought from Kolar.
He had only last week spoken to one of his closest friends and said that he wanted to go Harvard or Oxford for further studies. We can never believe he committed suicide.
We were proud of him as our senior, our University is proud of him as a brilliant student, his family is proud of him as a good son and husband, Kolar is proud of him as an eminent Deputy Commissioner, mother India is proud of him but the only one who is not is the government for which he lost his life.
Yes, not an end, the death of one Ravi will give birth to thousands of Ravis and for all those Ravi anna will be the model as always since his college days inspiring everyone around. Ravi anna's presence will be with us for ever and ever...
http://www.ndtv.com/blog/in-memory-of-my-senior-dk-ravi-748495?story_interestedin_related

Thursday 19 March 2015

Politics of Indian cricket


The cutthroat politics of Indian cricket In all the ups and downs of India’s post-liberalization Gilded Age, one sector of the nation’s economy has proved utterly recession-proof: cricket Chandrahas Choudhury

Read more at: http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/bKNvRCajZr3mNiqtqJORvI/The-cutthroat-politics-of-Indian-cricket.html?google_editors_picks=true&utm_source=copy

The cutthroat politics of Indian cricket

In all the ups and downs of India’s post-liberalization Gilded Age, one sector of the nation’s economy has proved utterly recession-proof: cricket

As many wits have remarked, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is well-named: The emphasis falls on the word “control.” Photo: HT
In all the ups and downs of India’s post-liberalization Gilded Age, one sector of the nation’s economy has proved utterly recession-proof: cricket.
A series of conjunctures have, over the last three decades, turned India into something more than just the largest field seeded with cricket by the British empire. The most populous by far of the world’s major cricket-playing nations, India has become the sport’s financial powerhouse. Television broadcast rights, a marquee league, advertising and endorsements, sports management firms, even betting and the odd bout of match-fixing: The white and black economies of cricket today all revolve around India.
At an extraordinary meeting last year of cricket’s governing body, the International Cricket Council (ICC), India’s representative claimed (with only a touch of exaggeration) that the country deserved a bigger share of the ICC’s profits as more than 80% of revenues were generated by India. Think of America’s power at the United Nations, and you have some sense of India’s place in the cricket world.
Luck and chance may have had something to do with it, but the rise of Indian cricket was not an accident. For every person who would ascribe its meteoric ascent to demographic factors—the appearance of satellite television in the early ‘90s, the Indian diaspora, India’s own rise to become a major power on the field of play itself—there is another who would point to the role of the governing body of cricket as the (often shadowy) mastermind of this revolution.
As many wits have remarked, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is well-named: The emphasis falls on the word “control.” The BCCI is a fascinating economic entity—registered as a non-profit society, run not by professional management but by a board of elected members, and with monopoly rights over most cricket in India and all Indian cricket abroad, including, most important, television rights, the biggest source of cash in the game.
In absolute terms, the revenues and annual profits of the BCCI are smaller than those of hundreds of Indian corporations. (Last year, the BCCI’s surplus was `364 crore, approximately $60 million.) But its business profile is equal to those of major Indian companies—Reliance Industries, Infosys, Tata. Many of those firms have extensive interests in the cricket economy, dealing in goods and technologies that need the emotion and the stars generated by cricket to sell them.
In fact, the personal perks, access to funds and discretionary powers that come with being a “voting member” of the BCCI’s 30-member board, as well as the cachet of Indian cricket and the global profile of the group’s president, make being an officeholder in one of the world’s richest sporting bodies more desirable than almost any corporate post in India. Even if the job is unpaid: Most of the posts are “honorary,” and the board only created its first paid position in 2006.
This mix of power, intrigue, patronage and glamour—membership in an exclusive secret society controlling the more visible sporting drama and energy of bat and ball—is utterly irresistible. And never more seductive than to the career politician, who sees in Indian cricket an enormous opportunity to leverage and redouble his own power.
So which prominent names in Indian politics have a foot planted in cricket “administration”? Well, let’s begin right at the top of the pyramid of power.
Last June, the Gujarat Cricket Association called a special meeting to appoint a new president. The sitting president, Narendra Modi, had just resigned, having become prime minister. Modi had not only been chief minister of Gujarat since 2001, but he had also taken over control of the association in 2009, bringing an end to long years of domination in the post by Congress Party politicians.
Who would replace Modi? The association elected as its president Amit Shah, Modi’s right-hand man in the national election and now the second-most powerful man in India. Shortly afterward, Shah was also appointed head of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Up in New Delhi, Arun Jaitley (now India’s finance minister) had brought an end to his 13-year-long presidency of the Delhi District Cricket Association at the end of 2013, with one eye on a future role in government. Had the BJP not won the national election, Jaitley would have in all likelihood made a run for BCCI president this year.
The BCCI is so powerful in world cricket that even dishonour on the job—such as that experienced by a previous president, the powerful businessman N. Srinivasan— only brings further gains. In 2013, Srinivasan was forced to step down after serious charges of corruption were levelled at his son-in-law, Gurunath Meiyappan. He failed to get reinstated, and he was told by the Supreme Court of India that he was “killing the game of cricket.”
With the report of the inquiry against him still pending, Srinivasan decided to run last year for head of the ICC instead. In June, he was handed charge of cricket administration globally, a development the BCCI called “a proud and historic moment for Indian cricket.” But to most cricket fans, including many Indian ones, Srinivasan’s presidency is nothing short of scandalous.
What will the future of the cricket world be like? That depends almost entirely on India and—this is not something that will reassure any cricket fan—on the uncontrollable Board of Control for Cricket in India. Bloomberg

Wednesday 18 March 2015

THE JESUITS – 10 FACTS


THE JESUITS – 10 FACTS

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.” – Yahushua in Matthew 7:15 (NKJV)    
“We came in like lambs and will rule like wolves.” -Francesco Borgia, Third Jesuit Superior General.
superior-general
(The Superior General of the Society of Jesus is the official title of the leader of the Roman Catholic religious order, the Jesuits. He is generally addressed as Father General. The position sometimes carries the derogatory nickname of the Black Pope. The current Superior General is the Reverend Father Adolfo Nicolás.)
The Society of Jesus, more commonly referred to as the Jesuits, are the armed militia of the Roman Catholic Church.  They were sanctioned in 1540 by Pope Paul III with one mandate: to defeat Protestantism and regain global Papal rule.  To achieve this monumental task, they employ ever-adapting methods of pseudo-education, social programs, infiltration, and all wickedness that could possibly be conceived.  Needless to say, they are achieving great success in their mission, which is climaxing with the present pope, Pope Francis, i.e.  the Eighth and last Pope of Revelation 17, who held some of the highest positions in Argentina, including Provincial Superior in the Society of Jesus and Archbishop of Buenos Aires.   He was made a cardinal by Pope John Paul II.
Today most of the world is oblivious as to how Jesuits operate, from their inception to this very day.  Now more than ever, World’s Last Chance believes it is exceedingly important to bring up the following historical facts about this evil society, to expose the wicked nature of this truly malevolent order.
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #1
Pope Clement XIV abolished the Jesuits as a society in 1773:
220px-Clemens_XIV
It did not take long for the 18th Century Catholic nations to get tired of the meddling of the Jesuits into their national affairs.   They were so infuriated against the Jesuits that they demanded the Roman Catholic Church abolish them once and for all.  Sufficient political pressure was brought to bear on Pope Clement XIII.  However, he passed away before he could do anything about it.  The task of abolishing the Society of Jesus then fell on his successor, Clement XIV.  As Clement XIV signed the decree abolishing the Jesuit Order he said, “I have signed my death warrant,…” Within nine months he was dead.  [Many contemporaries considered his death a case of poisoning, and suspected the Jesuits were responsible].
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #2
No other entity on Earth was expelled and suppressed by Catholic and non-Catholic countries as the Jesuits:
image_provider
Obviously the Jesuits were not expelled from many nations (even Catholic nations) because of their educational or charity work.  They were expelled for engaging in and carrying out subversive political plots against humanity to advance their own cause.
“Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [i.e., Thomas J.  Campbell].  Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection.”
The Jesuits are known for their deception, spying, infiltration, assassination, and revolution.  They worked deep into the political field and plotted through politics throughout the world countries.
Source: “The Babington Plot”, by J.E.C.  Shepherd, p.12
When the Jesuits are expelled from a country, they simply change strategies and return to the country they were expelled from under a new disguise.  The following sums up their operational strategy:
“We came in like lambs and will rule like wolves.  We shall be expelled like dogs and return like eagles.”
Source: Francesco Borgia, Third Jesuit Superior General.
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #3
Hitler modeled his dreaded SS army and party after the organizational structure of the Jesuits and the Roman Catholic Church:
hitler-portrait
“…the SS organization had been constituted according to the principles of the Jesuit Order.”
Source: “The Secret History of the Jesuits,” by Edmond Paris, p.  164
Walter Schellenberg, former chief of Nazi counter-espionage made this statement: “The S.S.  organization had been constituted by Himmler [Heinrich Himmler, leading member of the Nazi party] according to the principles of the Jesuit Order.  Their regulations and the Spiritual Exercises prescribed by Ignatius of Loyola were the model Himmler tried to copy exactly.  Himmler’s title as supreme chief of the S.S.  was to be the equivalent of the Jesuits’ ‘General’ and the whole structure was a close imitation of the Catholic Church’s hierarchical order.” “The Secret History of the Jesuits,” by Edmond Paris, p.  164
Above all I have learned from the Jesuits.   And so did Lenin too, “far as I recall.  The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church.  There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the Party.
Source: Manfred Barthel, “The Jesuits: History and Legend of the Society of Jesus (New York, 1984), Adolf Hitler,  p.266.
“I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits”, said Hitler…  “Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church.  I transferred much of this organization into my own party…  I am going to let you in on a secret…  I am founding an Order…  In my “Burgs” of the Order, we will raise up a youth which will make the world tremble…  Hitler then stopped, saying that he couldn’t say any more..
Source: “Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed.  Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).
“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book .  .  .  was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler.  For .  .  .  it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”
Source: Edmond Paris, The Secret History of the Jesuits, page 138
Franz von Papen, another powerful Nazi, who was instrumental in setting up the concordat between Germany and the Vatican had this to say: “The Third Reich is the first world power which not only acknowledges but also puts into practice the high principles of the papacy.”
Source: www.chick.com
300px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-R24391_Konkordatsunterzeichnung_in_Rom1
Signing the concordat is Cardinal Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII). By 1933 he was the Vatican Secretary of State. Second from left is Franz von Papen, a sinister Nazi and devout Roman Catholic who was Hitler’s ace diplomat and the Vatican’s agent in helping to bring Hitler to power. Standing at the far right can be seen the little-known Vatican prelate, Montini, later to become Pope Paul VI.
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #4
Over the last 400 years the Jesuits have succeeded in establishing the largest worldwide network of schools and universities.
rev-large
These prominent schools and universities, have produced many well known alumni.  Thus, the Jesuits have been able to shape and mould the thinking of many famous world leaders, and produce generations of political and religious leaders who were favorable to the Roman Catholic Church, and her doctrinal agenda.
The renowned British preacher, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, once warned about the church ministers who are graduating from these universities that “… they keep back a portion of the gospel … having studied in the devil’s new Jesuitical college.”
Source: Charles H.  Spurgeon “A Solemn Warning for All Churches,” Sermon No.  68
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #5
Agents of the Jesuits have been responsible for assassinating many heads of State over the centuries:
Heads of states were assassinated by the Jesuits, when they attempt to suppress the influence and meddling of the Jesuits in their national affairs.  Of heads of states that are known to have been assassinated by Jesuits we mention for example: William of Orange, Kings Henry III and Henry IV of France, Czars Alexander I and Alexander II of Russia, President Abraham Lincoln and John F.  Kennedy, and Mexican President Benito Pablo Juarez.
Abraham-Lincoln-Shooting
Abraham Lincoln was fully aware of the evil nature of the Jesuits.  He stated, “…  it is not against the Americans of the South, alone, I am fighting.  It is more against the Pope of Rome, his perfidious Jesuits and their blind and blood-thirsty slaves that we have to defend ourselves.”
Source: Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, “by Charles Chiniquy.  p.  496
“It would seem that the Jesuits had had it in mind, from the beginning of the war [the American Civil War of 1861-1865], to find an occasion for the taking off [i.e., the assassination] of Mr.  [Abraham] Lincoln.”
Source: Thomas M.  Harris (U.S.  Army Brigadier General; Author of the book Rome’s Responsibility for the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln)
“The favorite policy of the Jesuits [is] that of assassination.”
Source: 
U.S.  Army Brigadier General Thomas M.  Harris; “Rome’s Responsibility for the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln”; 1897; Page 19) 
“It is of faith that the Pope has the right of deposing heretical and rebel kings. Monarchs so deposed by the Pope are converted into notorious tyrants, and may be killed by the first who can reach them.
“If the public cause cannot meet with its defense in the death of a tyrant, it is lawful for the first who arrives, to assassinate him.”
[Defensio DideiJesuit Suarez, Book VI. C 4, Nos. 13, 14]
[Donald] Freed remembers what apparently passes for polite conversation when men such as [William] Colby and [Ray] Cline get together. “It was quite bizarre” Freed said, “for the subject they chose was, ‘When is it acceptable to assassinate a head of state?’ Colby presented what he said was a theological and philosophically sound approach. “The Catholic Church,” he said, “had long since wrestled with this question and had,” to Colby’s mind, emerged with a sound concept: “It is acceptable,” he said, “to assassinate a tyrant.”  [Donald Freed is a friend of the author, Mark Lane.  He organized a conference at USC for the U.S. intelligence community and its critics to meet.  In the panel were Lane, Ellsberg and John Gerassi, all critics. On the other side were William Colby, former DCI (Director of Central Intelligence from September 1973 to January 1976), David Atlee Phillips, and Ray Cline, former deputy DCI’s.]
[Plausible Denial, Mark Lane, 1991, p. 85]
jfk-last-moments
President John F. Kennedy was another victim of appalling Jesuit wickedness.  Once he outwardly distanced himself from the Papal agenda and stood for more liberal ideals and human rights, he was considered, by their standards, a traitor to the Vatican and a “tyrant” worthy of death.
This is an excerpt from “Vatican Assassins” by Eric Jon Phelps
Knowing that President Kennedy was not going to escalate the Vietnam War, the Intelligence Community began to prepare for his assassination. . . . Cardinal Spellman [Francis Spellman, Archbishop of New York from 1939-1967], through FDR, had arranged the release of “Lucky” Luciano . . . Now the Cardinal needed a favor. If refused, Spellman could  use the entire intelligence community which he had helped to organize, to eliminate any mob boss. If agreed to, new gambling centers would open up, Atlantic City in particular.  Clearly, if the President [JFK] was removed, everybody would acquire more power and wealth, the intelligence community would become more absolute, and the Cardinal would be even more respected by his peers in Rome.
Later, in 1964, for the first time in history, the Pope of Rome set foot in Fourteenth Amendment America. Cardinal Spellman had performed well and was rewarded by a visit from his Master, fellow Cold Warrior and Vatican Ratline handler, Cardinal Montini, who was now Pope Paul VI.  There is yet another reason for the removal of President Kennedy. He wanted to arm Israel. Loftus writes:
“In September 1962 Kennedy decided to supply Israel with defensive ground-to-air missiles capable of stopping aircraft, but not the Egyptian offensive missiles. It was the first arms sale by the U.S. Government to Israel…. Kennedy promised the Israelis that as soon as the 1964 election was over, he would break the CIA ‘into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds’…. With Kennedy’s assassination in November 1963, the Israelis lost the best friend they had in the White House since Truman departed.” Source: The Secret War Against The Jews, John Loftus, 1994]
     And why did the Vatican’s Jesuits not want any arms sales to Israel at this time? Why did the Jesuit-controlled President Johnson turn his back as the Egyptian army moved up through the Sinai desert to prepare its assault on Israel in 1967? Because the attack upon Israel had to be provoked. That attack was provoked by the Jesuits’ International Intelligence Community through Egypt falsely perceiving the weakness of the Israeli army and the supposed abandonment of Israel by the American Empire.  The six-day war, engineered by Knight of Malta James Angleton, had one primary purpose: the taking of Jerusalem along with the Temple Mount. The apparent lack of military hardware on the part of Israel provoked the planned attack by Egypt. Therefore, Israel launched a preemptive strike and, in six days, the holy city was in the hands of Rome’s Zionist government.

Had Kennedy armed Israel, the Egyptians would never have been emboldened to maneuver for war. With no provoked war, there would have been no Israeli attack. With no Israeli attack, Jerusalem would never have been taken by the Zionists, controlled by the Jesuits’ Mossad.  With Jerusalem in Arab hands, the Zionists could never rebuild Solomon’s Temple—unbeknown to them—for the Jesuits’ “infallible” Pope,
“Who opposeth and exalted himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so he is God sitteth in the temple of God [Solomon’s rebuilt temple], showing himself that he is God.”
-[II Thes 2:4] 
It is safe to say that the Jesuit Generalusing the Pope with his most powerful Cardinal, [assassinated President Kennedy].
pieta1
One might assume that this emotive painting would hang somewhere in Dallas, Texas or perhaps in the Smithsonian.  And one would be wrong on both counts.  This painting of President John F. Kennedy’s gruesome assassination, by Mark Balma, hangs in the Vatican Cathedral of St. Paul.  The painting is entitled “Pietà” after Michelangelo’s famous sculpture of Mary holding the body of the crucified Christ, which is also located at the Vatican.  Isn’t this a macabre way to “celebrate” the life of perhaps America’s most beloved President? or is this rather an homage to the Jesuit agenda, serving as a stern warning/reminder to those willing to cross them?
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #6
The Jesuits today control all the powerful secret societies that are shaping the New World Order
25523
“The list of secret societies being controlled by the Jesuits today include: the Freemasonry, the Knights of Malta, the Bilderberg group, and the higher levels of the Knights of Columbus, and the highest levels of Opus Dei – and all the subgroups that fall under these powerful entities.”
“There are still …[men and women] about the country, who will tell you, with grim gravity that, if you trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you come to the grand tip-top, head Mason of the world, you will discover that the dread individual and the Chief of the Society of Jesus are one and the same person!”
Source: James Parton, 1855, American Historian, The Black Pope, M.F.  Cusack, (London: Marshall, Russell & Co., 1896) p.  76.
If the above is true, than the example below would be a meeting of two of the most powerful men on Earth! The Head of the Jesuits and the Pope, who is also a Jesuit.
Father General Nicolás [Superior General of the Society of Jesus/Jesuits] meets with Pope Francis and wrote of his experience.
superior-general-meets-pope
“At the personal invitation of the Pope Francis I went to the Santa Marta House. . . He was at the entrance and received me with the usual Jesuit embrace. We had a few pictures taken, at his request, and at my apologies for not keeping protocol he insisted that I treat him like any other Jesuit at the “Tu” level, so I did not have to worry about addressing him as “Your Holiness,” or “Holy Father.”  I offered him all our Jesuit resources because in his new position he is going to need counsel, thinking, persons, etc. He showed gratitude for this and at the invitation to visit us for lunch at the Curia he said he would oblige.  There was full commonality of feeling on several issues that we discussed and I remained with the conviction that we will work very well together for the service of the Church …
There was calm, humor and mutual understanding about past, present and future.  I left the Casa de Santa Marta convinced that the Pope will gladly count on our collaboration in the vineyard of the Lord.  At the end he helped me with my coat and accompanied me to the door.  That added a couple of salutes to me from the Swiss Guards there.  A Jesuit embrace, once again, as the natural way to greet and send off a friend.”
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #7
The Jesuits are responsible for fomenting the two world wars and escalating the Vietnam War after President Kennedy’s assassination:
0191
Image URL: http://www.chick.com/catalog/books/images/0191.jpg
“The public is practically unaware of the overwhelming responsibility carried by the Vatican and its Jesuits in the starting of the two world wars – a situation which may be explained in part by the gigantic finances at the disposition of the Vatican and its Jesuits, giving them power in so many spheres, especially since the last conflict.”
Source: Edmond Paris, The Secret History of the Jesuits, page 9
Here is a link to the entire e-bookwww.spirituallysmart.com
The documented atrocities committed by the Jesuits, particularly those under the Ustachi (or Ustaše) are particularly disturbing and shocking, especially since there are actual photographs of such evil.  This didn’t happen hundreds or thousands of years ago.  It happened in the 1940’s!  Here are a few links to some of the nothing short of satanic genocide the Ustachi carried out under the rule of Ante Pavelić, a Catholic Croatian fascist leader, who occupied part of Yugoslavia for Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, and ultimately for the Papacy.  For many in Yugoslavia it was either convert to Catholicism or be brutally tortured and killed.
catholic-heil
 Catholic Bishops giving the Nazi salute in honor of Hitler; Note far right: Joseph Goebbels and second from right: Wilhelm Frick
ante-facing-cardinal-stepinac
 Pavelić facing Cardinal Stepinac who was arrested for War crimes and went to jail and died under house arrest but was beautified by the Pope JPII in 1998
100px-Ustase_symbol.svg
Ustachi symbol
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #8
After Pope Pius VII was freed from exile in 1814, his first order of business upon returning to Rome was to restore the Jesuit order
pope0251b
The papacy suffered great humiliation at the hand of Napoleon.  Thus, right after the defeat of Napoleon in 1814, Pope Pius VII was freed from imprisonment and was returned to Rome.  The need to restore the Jesuit militia became an urgent matter.  Rome did not want to be deprived again of the services of the Jesuits, no matter how burdensome this service was to the Church of Rome, and its allies.
“In the agreement to rescue Rome [i.e., the Roman Catholic Church’s hierarchy] from the predicament of losing its world control to Protestantism, and to preserve the spiritual and temporal supremacy which the popes [had] ‘usurped’ during the Middle Ages, Rome now ‘sold’ the [Roman Catholic] Church to the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuits]; in essence the popes surrendered themselves into their hands.”
Source: John Daniel (“The Grand Design Exposed”; 1999; Page 64)
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #9
The Jesuit Order took over the Office of Inquisition shortly after it was sanctioned and this led to the martyrdom of millions of saints
Galilei-1633
In 1254 Pope Alexander IV established the Office of the Inquisition.  The first inquisitor was Dominic, who was the founder of the Dominican order of monks.
However, shortly after Pope Paul III sanctioned the Society of Jesus, the Office of Inquisition was revived and the Pope gave free reign to the Jesuits to run this office, and the inquisitor Generals were granted exceptional powers in carrying out their mandate to root out of all “heretics.” This caused the martyrdom of millions of saints.
The quotes below show the effect of Jesuits taking over the Office of the Inquisition:
“Need I speak to you of the thirty years’ war in Germany, which was mainly instigated by the Jesuits, in order to deprive the Protestants of the right of free religious worship, secured to them by the treaty of Augsburg? Or of the Irish rebellion, of the inhuman butchery of about fifteen millions of Indians in South America, Mexico and Cuba, by the Spanish papists? In short, it is calculated by authentic historians, that papal Rome has shed the blood of sixty-eight millions of the human race in order to establish her unfounded claims to religious dominion.” Source: Dr.  Brownlee’s “Popery an enemy to civil liberty”, p.  105
“This was the century of the last religious wars in “Christendom,” the Thirty Years’ War in Germany, fomented by the Jesuits, reducing the people to cannibalism, and the population of Bohemia from 4,000,000 to 780,000, and of Germany from 20,000,000 to 7,000,000, and making Southern Germany almost a desert, …”
Source: Cushing B.  Hassell, History of the Church of God, Chapter XVII.
Writing about the Jesuits, [John] Lord states
“They are accused of securing the revocation of the Edict of Nantes,– one of the greatest crimes in the history of modern times, which led to the expulsion of four hundred thousand Protestants from France, and the execution of four hundred thousand more.”
Source: John Lord, Beacon Lights of History, volume VI, p.  325.
“In Bohemia, by 1600, in a population of 4,000,000, 80 per cent were Protestant.   When the Hapsburgs and Jesuits had done their work, 800,000 were left, all Catholics.”
Source: Henry H., Pocket Bible Handbook, Chicago, 13th edition, 1939, p.  790.
—————————————————————————————————–
Fact #10
The Jesuits succeeded in their destructive agenda through dominating the confessor field wherever they went
in_spain_06
“The Jesuits became the predominant group supplying confessors to (meaning, hearers of the confessions of) kings and princes and those in authority.  As the New Catholic Encyclopedia says, “they acted as royal confessor to all French kings for 2 centuries, from Henry III to Louis XV; to all German emperors after the early 17th century; to all Dukes of Bavaria after 1579; to most rulers of Poland and Portugal; to princely families throughout Europe.
“As advisors to kings, they influenced political policy.  A royal confessor was not slow to tell a king that he had a duty to make the kind of political alliances that would promote the temporal interests of the Church.  It was Le Tellier, Jesuit confessor to Louis XIV, who in the 1680’s persuaded that monarch to revoke the Edict of Nantes, which granted religious liberty to Protestants.”
Source: http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/44.html
The Jesuits are even confessors of popes.  “The Pope’s confessor, an ordinary priest, must be a Jesuit: he must visit the Vatican once a week at a fixed time, and he alone may absolve the Pope of his sins.”
—————————————————————————————————–
Conclusion:
Ignatius-Loyola-by-Francisco-Zurbaran
Ignatius Loyola – Jesuit Founder – by Francisco Zurbaran
Given the above historic facts about the Jesuits, it is incredulous and most shocking to see the media and the world’s religious and political leaders stampeding to endorse and praise Pope Francis.  We have no words to describe this unprecedented global epidemic of memory loss towards Rome and her Jesuits.
The prescient warning of General Sherman is most appropriate to quote today:
“I would remind you of Webster’s definition of a Jesuit: a designer, an intriguer.  If the Church of Rome prevailed, the Pope would be the Universal King .  .  .  The Jesuits are here to plot and scheme and, if possible, take from us the noble heritage of our civil and religious freedom.  The rules of the Jesuit Order justify theft, licentiousness, lying, false-witness bearing, suicide and the murder of parents and other relatives.  The greatest crimes in history committed against individuals and nations have been committed by the Jesuits .  .  .  Wherever Jesuits are they have the torch to burn, the sword to slay, the inquisition to torture.  They are the enemies of [Bible-believing] Christianity.  They live for conquest, fortune and glory.”
Source: General Sherman’s Son: The Life of Thomas Ewing Sherman, S.J., Joseph T.  Durkin, S.  J., (New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, 1959) p.  186.
It is our duty to as followers of Yahuwah to expose Rome and her Jesuits, and to pray for the utter destruction of their evil deceit.  Prayer is the only weapon we have against this veiled enemy we face today.  Rome and her Jesuits are the greatest enemy of the Gospel and of humanity.  However, we are assured in His prophetic Word that they will not prevail.  The Harlot will be utterly destroyed prior to the Second Coming of Yahushua:
“And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.” Revelation 17:16.
Praise His name for ever and ever!!
Source:

Monday 9 March 2015

These 13 Families Rule The World: The Shadow Forces Behind The NWO


These 13 Families Rule The World: The Shadow Forces Behind The NWO




01-Jacob-Rothschild
The shadow forces behind the New World Order (NWO) are following a slow-paced agenda of total control over mankind and our planet’s resources. David Icke coined it the “Totalitarian Tip-Toe,” because “they” are making very small steps towards our complete and definitive enslavement.
As a result, the masses remain relatively unaware of the fact that their liberties are being gradually taken away, while the power of the NWO octopus grows steadily.

The shadow forces behind the NWO agenda
Somewhere near the very top of the pyramid, an extremely elitist organisation known as the Council of the 13 families orchestrates all of the major world events. As the name suggests, the Council consists of the top 13 most influential families on Earth.
01 Pyramid of power - all seeing eye - financial elite
An increasingly number of people is becoming aware that 99% of the Earth’s population is controlled by an “elite” 1%, but the Council of the 13 families consists of less than 1% of the 1% “elite” and nobody on Earth can apply formembership.
In their opinion, they are entitled to rule over the rest of us because they are the direct descendants of the ancient gods and consider themselves royal. These families are:

  1. Rothschild (Bauer or Bower)
  2. Bruce
  3. Cavendish (Kennedy)
  4. De Medici
  5. Hanover
  6. Hapsburg
  7. Krupp
  8. Plantagenet
  9. Rockefeller
  10. Romanov
  11. Sinclair (St. Clair)
  12. Warburg (del Banco)
  13. Windsor (Saxe-Coburg-Gothe)
(Personally, I suspect that this may not be the complete list and some very powerful lineages are still unknown to us).
The Rothschild dynasty is unquestionably the most powerful – visible – bloodline on Earth and their estimated wealth is around $500 trillions!
They exercise their power through the world banking empire, which is almost entirely owned by them.
The most important institutions that work hard to establish the NWO and completely enslave our species, are:
  1. The City of London (finance, controlled by the Rothschilds) – NOT part of the UK;
  2. The US Federal Reserve (finance – private bank, owned by the Rothschilds) – NOT part of the USA;
  3. The Vatican City (indoctrination, deception and scare tactics) – NOT part of Italy;
  4. Washington D.C. (military, mind programming, brainwashing and depopulation) – NOT part of the USA;
All of the above institutions function as individual states, operating under their own laws, hence there is no court of law on Earth that could ever prosecute them.
The multitude of Secret Societies in existence today, operate as branches of a mega corporation, which is owned by the Council of the 13 families.
Even though they have been handsomely rewarded for their work, the members of these secret societies are not members of the “elite” bloodlines, they don’t know who their masters are and they have no idea what the real agenda is.
The brainwashing
Another mass-enslavement tool that they are using against us, is the so called educational system. Schools are no longer what they used to be and children are learning to memorize without thinking and obey without questioning.
In fact, this established educational system is extremely expensive to keep operational and obsolete in the age of the internet.
“Why obsolete?” you may ask. Because the internet gives us free access to almost infinite amounts of information.
So why are we still paying huge amounts of money for governmental education? Because the world’s “elite” require that our children learn conformity and inside-the-box thinking.
What can we do about it?
Mankind’s faith is hanging in the balance right now, as the control of the NWO octopus spreads. On the one hand, we are very close to our complete enslavement, while on the other hand, we could easily crumble to the ground their pyramid of power, by simply uniting against their deception in a peaceful revolution of minds, hearts and souls.
I’ve asked myself for years what their greatest weapon of enslavement is. Is it poor education combined with constant indoctrination? Is it the fear generated by religion? Is it the fear of being punished (jailed or killed) by the system, or is it the invisible enslavement of the monetary system?
In my opinion, all of the above combined had a huge impact on our society and the way we think, but their biggest weapon is hands-down the financial system!
Currency slaves
The financial system has stealthy enslaved our species and now we are being used as currency slaves. We work from 9 to 5 every day, in boring and depressing environments, not stimulated by anything creative or constructive.
In most cases, the sole motivation for going to work, is the next paycheck — and no matter how hard we work, we never seem to have enough money.
Have you ever wondered why mega-corporations (reaping $billions/year in profits) pay dozens of millions to their CEOs and as close as possible to the minimum wage to the rest of the employees?
This has been carefully designed, because a person that is constantly “on the edge,” will never have time for self-education, introspection and – eventually – spiritual awakening.
Isn’t this our main purpose on Earth? To become spiritual beings (and by spiritual, I obviously don’t mean religious) and complete the incarnation cycle?
“They” don’t need educated people, who are capable of critical thinking and have spiritual goals. No, this kind of people are dangerous to the establishment!
“They” want obedient “robots,” just intelligent enough to operate the machines and keep the system running, but stupid enough never to ask questions.
Money is the eye of the “devil”
All of the world’s biggest problems have their roots deeply embedded in the financial plague: wars are profitable, diseases are profitable, Earth’s plundering is profitable, human slavery and inhumane working conditions are profitable.
Our leaders have been corrupted by money and mankind’s collective mission on Earth has been hijacked by money.
So why do we need the financial system, in the first place? Actually, we don’t need it (at least, not anymore). The planet doesn’t charge us a cent for using its natural resources and we have the technology to extract them without physically working a day.